Aligning the Essential Elements of Commodity Risk Management

Aligning essential elements for effective commodity risk management ensures energy companies can weather commodity price volatility.

By John Echols and Greg Crowley

Previously, we described our view of the fundamental principles for commodity risk management. This framework was developed from observing risk-related problems and failures over time. Sadly, the underlying causes of trading-related failures are often repeated. Our framework is a progressive approach that begins with a thoughtful view of an enterprise’s risk appetite that then drives the development of risk policy, risk limits, and reporting—all set within a proper organizational design. This organizational design features a clear front-, mid- and back-office separation, and the designation of a risk control function to provide oversight.

Apart from establishing the essential elements for effective commodity risk management, we now focus on the importance and process for aligning different parts of a risk management environment and, more importantly, keeping them aligned. Changes in an enterprise’s internal strategy, as well as external changes out of an enterprise’s control such as market price fluctuations, regulation, or other factors, can create a perfect storm of an otherwise ineffective risk control environment.

Consider the following example:

An integrated utility established an unregulated trading and marketing group and properly established risk policies, limits, and oversight at that time. As the utility’s strategic focus reverted to emphasize the core regulated earnings of the enterprise, the previously established trading limits and the exposure implied from such limits became out of sync. Most telling, in outlining the potential volatility implied in the existing trading policy to the enterprise’s head of investor relations, it was clear that investors were unprepared for potential outcomes that were fully sanctioned by the existing trading policy.

READ Our related commodity trading & Risk Management client Case studies


Aligning Commodity Risk Appetite Starts At The Top

In simplest terms, aligning the organization for commodity risk starts and stops with a Board-directed view of risk appetite. Board members may or may not be deeply knowledgeable in commodity risk. However, a Board-level forum for determining risk appetite is a sound place to start a dialog to ensure that all parts of an organization hear and are being heard in discussing the risk. Linking the reporting of risk with commercial performance reporting is another technique to raise awareness and align interests.

For companies with existing risk management activities, and an existing risk management/trading policy, one approach could be to include terms in the policy that requires ongoing discussion with the Board. This discussion would encompass:

  • Embedded commodity risk in the company’s operations without risk management efforts.
  • Qualitative outline of how the existing commercial strategies and trading limits act to address such embedded risk taking into account the recent and expected volatility of the markets.
  • Assessment of potential effects on operating results if the existing embedded risks, commercial strategies, trading limits, and market conditions work as expected—that is, the development of a reasonable scenario for the Board’s consideration.
Laying The Foundation For An Assessment Of Embedded Commodity Risk

For risk management functions in the process of being established, a comprehensive assessment of embedded commodity risk in the enterprise is foundational. Management and the Board must conclude whether the embedded commodity risk is acceptable or not—the development of commercial strategies, policies, and limits flow from the conclusion that embedded risk is NOT acceptable.

Translating embedded risk and acceptable risk into terms understood across the entire organization is essential to thwarting commodity risk “surprises” over time. Changes in corporate strategy, changes in markets, and actual risk management results provide a strong case for an intentional effort to examine a company’s commodity risk management on a periodic, ongoing basis.

Finally, for lenders, we believe understanding how counterparties assess the alignment of their risk appetite, corporate strategy, commercial strategies, and limits (or don’t) can be an important element in knowing your customer.

[Back To Top]

About the Authors:

John Echols is a Partner in Opportune LLP’s Energy Consulting Practice. John has over 30 years of business experience, including six years as a senior executive in the energy industry. John was a partner with Arthur Andersen’s audit practice serving energy clients in the firm’s Houston and New Orleans offices. John left Andersen to join Enron’s wholesale energy trader, serving as Managing Director in both commercial and commercial support roles, assisting in the structuring of complex gas supply contracts, as well as the design of complex integrated power and gas arrangements. He has extensive experience in evaluating and remediating commodity risk management functions. John also provides extensive support for energy-related bankruptcies and restructuring, providing both creditor and debtor-side support, including litigation support, claims administration, and testimony for debtor-in-possession financing.

Greg Crowley is a Director in Opportune LLP’s Strategy and Enterprise Risk practice areas. During his 25-year energy-centered career he has created and led several commodity trading platforms in both the physical and financial institutional environments. Greg has worked across multiple industry segments helping companies understand the market, credit, liquidity, and operational risks. He has helped companies identify optimal funding and credit solutions, effective price hedging solutions, and navigate challenging conditions resulting from price movement, litigation, or bankruptcy. Before joining Opportune, Greg was Managing Director and head of Commodity America’s at Credit Agricole CIB in New York where he managed all aspects of the bank’s commodity derivative business. He has traded physical and financial energy products, originated various structured finance solutions within the energy sector, and led several system infrastructure improvement projects.

John Echols

PartnerOpportune LLP

Greg Crowley

DirectorOpportune LLP

want more industry insights? subscribe below